🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 698+ reviews
Women ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

ONLVIC - Print T-shirt - vintage indigo

★★★★★ 4.6 out of 5 (698 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$14.99
$24.98
Sale
✓ at no charge fulfillment on this item • Limited time offer

Neckline : Crew neckFastening : ZipPattern : FloralArticle number : ON321E2M9-K12

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping

↩️
effortless Returns

📋 Product Description

ONLVIC - Print T-shirt - vintage indigo

Neckline : Crew neck
Fastening : Zip
Pattern : Floral
Article number : ON321E2M9-K12

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 942823

Category: Women > Clothing > Shirts & Blouses

Original Price: $24.98 USD

Sale Price: $14.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.6
★★★★★
Based on 4442 reviews
SM
Sarah Miller ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Atlanta, GA
★★★★★
definitely impressed
Nice and reliable ONLVIC - Print T-shirt - vintage indigo.
31 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker
7 months ago · Austin, TX
★★★★★
Brilliant ONLVIC - Print T-shirt - vintage indigo
So far, the ONLVIC - Print T-shirt - vintage indigo feels okay and it works for me.
28 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Fort Worth, TX
★★★★★
flawless for my needs
After a few days, it performs as expected and it meets expectations. Arrived on time.
18 people found this helpful
NH​
Nicole Harris ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Philadelphia, PA
★★★★☆
really happy
Honestly, the ONLVIC - Print T-shirt - vintage indigo performs as expected and I don’t regret it.
22 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White
9 months ago · Pittsburgh, PA
★★★★★
leading purchase ever
the ONLVIC - Print T-shirt - vintage indigo is practical so it’s acceptable.
46 people found this helpful