🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 932+ reviews
Fashion ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Edwardian Carat Old Cut Diamond Engagement Ring, circa 1910

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5 (932 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6073
$10121.67
Sale
✓ at no charge fulfillment on this item • Limited time offer

Edwardian Carat Old Cut Diamond Engagement Ring, circa 1910

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid delivery
↩️
practical Returns

📋 Product Description

Edwardian Carat Old Cut Diamond Engagement Ring, circa 1910

Edwardian Carat Old Cut Diamond Engagement Ring, circa 1910

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Fashion products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 62741519

Category: Fashion > Products >

Original Price: $10121.67 USD

Sale Price: $6073 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 7968 reviews
NS
Nicole Scott ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Seattle, WA
★★★★★
Worth every penny
Top notch quality! It was a smart grab. Superb!
11 people found this helpful
WP
William Price ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · St. Louis, MO

★★★★★
foremost decision
splendid product, great price. It works as advertised, which is refreshing. Really satisfied!
48 people found this helpful
LG
Larry Green ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Seattle, WA
★★★★☆
fancy it!
highly pleased with this purchase. The construction is solid. Absolutely fantastic!
HM
Helen Murphy ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Jacksonville, FL
★★★★☆
Absolutely superb
fabulous quality. I can see this lasting for years. leading decision I made!
49 people found this helpful
JN
Jason Nelson ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Colorado Springs, CO
★★★★★
premier Edwardian Carat Old Cut Diamond Engagement Ring, circa 1910 ever
Exceeded entire my expectations! It looks superb in my home. Totally worth it!
50 people found this helpful